7.1.3.1 Adjusted OKRs
During the execution phase, teams may need to adjust their OKRs to reflect changing priorities, unforeseen challenges, or evolving business needs. Adjustments can include modifying key results, redefining success criteria, or even replacing objectives that no longer align with company goals. Adjustments should be based on data insights, performance trends, and stakeholder feedback. However, frequent changes should be avoided unless necessary, as they can disrupt focus and alignment. Adjusted OKRs help ensure that teams are working on the most impactful initiatives while maintaining strategic agility. The adjustment process should be collaborative, involving key stakeholders, and documented in OKR tracking tools or meeting notes to maintain transparency. By being open to adjusting OKRs when necessary, organizations can enhance their adaptability, improve execution effectiveness, and ensure that objectives remain relevant throughout the OKR cycle.
7.1.3.2 Corrective Actions
Corrective actions are strategic interventions taken when OKRs are at risk of failure or when progress is significantly lagging. These actions may include allocating additional resources, shifting priorities, addressing process inefficiencies, or redefining key results to make them more attainable. Corrective actions are typically identified during OKR check-ins or review meetings, where teams analyze roadblocks and determine the necessary steps to get back on track. A data-driven approach is essential in deciding corrective actions—teams should assess performance trends, gather feedback, and adjust strategies accordingly. Documentation and follow-up are also crucial to ensure that actions taken lead to meaningful improvements. By implementing timely corrective actions, organizations can mitigate risks, improve execution efficiency, and maximize the likelihood of OKR success.